Manejo de la pandemia de COVID-19 en hospitalización domiciliaria en dos hospitales comarcales españoles: qué significó, quiénes atendimos, quién falleció y como evolucionó la asistencia a lo largo del tiempo / Management of COVID-19 pandemic in hospital at home in two regional Spanish hospitals. what it meant, who we cared for, who died and how assistance has evolved over time

Introducción. La Hospitalización a Domicilio (HAD) es una modalidad de ingreso alternativa que puede resultar de gran utilidad en momentos de estrés sanitario como la pandemia de COVID-19. En el presente trabajo se recoge el manejo de los pacientes ingresados con COVID-19 en HAD en dos hospitales comarcales españoles durante dos años.Métodos. Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, observacional y retrospectivo de los pacientes ingresados en HAD con COVID-19. Posteriormente se realizó un análisis para caracterizar a los pacientes que fallecieron en HAD o a 30 días del alta y otro para comparar el manejo entre la primera fase del estudio (2020) y la segunda (2021 y parte de 2022).Resultados. Se reclutaron 167 pacientes. Un 52,1% se trasladaron para vigilar que continuaban mejorando frente a un 40,7% en los que se hizo para vigilar que no empeoraran. Los pacientes que fallecieron en HAD resultaron más ancianos (87,5 años de media), más comórbidos y con mayor probabilidad de ser no reanimables en caso de paro cardiaco (No RCP) (85%). En la segunda fase del estudio se ingresaron pacientes más ancianos, más comórbidos y en mayor grado No RCP que los ingresados en 2020.Conclusiones. La HAD es un recurso útil para aumentar la resiliencia de los sistemas sanitarios en casos de estrés como supuso la enfermedad por COVID-19. El desarrollo y crecimiento de las unidades ya existentes, así como la creación de otras nuevas allá donde no existan, puede ser una herramienta básica para la medicina del futuro (AU)

Introduction. Home Hospitalization (HH) is an alternative hospitalization modality that can be very useful in times of health stress such as the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper includes the management of patients admitted with COVID-19 in HH in two county spanish hospitals for two years.Methods. A descriptive, observational and retrospective study of all patients admitted at HH with a diagnosis of COVID-19 disease was carried out. Subsequently, further analysis was carried out to characterize the patients who died in HH or 30 days after discharge and another to compare the management between the first phase of the study (2020) and the second one (2021 and part of 2022).Results. A total of 167 patients were recruited. A 52.1% moved to watch that the recovery continued compared to 40.7% in which it was done to watch that they did not worsen. The patients who died in HAD were older (mean 87.5 years), more comorbid and more likely to have do-not resucitate orders (DNR) in case of cardiac arrest (85%). In the second phase of the study, older patients, more comorbid patients and with a greater degree of DNR orders were admitted than those admitted throughout 2020.Conclusions. HAD is a useful resource to increase the resilience of health systems in cases of stress such as the disease caused by COVID-19. The development and growth of existing units, as well as the creation of new ones where they do not exist, could be a basic tool for the medicine of the future (AU)

Antimicrobial management in community acquired pneumonia in hospital at home: Is there room for improvement?

INTRODUCTION: Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is common disease that can be treated in Hospital At Home (HAH). In this paper we evaluate the room of improvement in the use of antibiotics in CAP in HH. METHODS: Patients with CAP were retrospectively recruited in two Spanish hospitals from 1/1/18 to 10/30/19. Demographic, clinical and quality of antibiotic prescription variables were recorded. Subsequently, we created a new variable that collected six quality of care indicator, categorizing and comparing patients into two groups: good quality of care (4 or more indicators performed) or poor quality of care (3 or less indicators performed). RESULTS: We recruited 260 patients. The request for diagnostic tests and the adequacy to Clinical Practice Guidelines were 85.4% and 85.8% respectively. Percentages of de-escalation (53.7%) and sequential therapy (57.7%) when indicated were low. The average length of treatment was 7.3 days for intravenous and 9.5 days for total. Quality of prescription was good in 134 (63.2%) patients, being more frequent in those who were admitted directly to HAD from the emergency room. It was also associated with less readmission at 30 days. CONCLUSION: There is a wide room for improvement in some fields of antimicrobials use in HAH that could stimulate the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.

Manejo antibiótico en neumonía adquirida en la comunidad en la hospitalización a domicilio: ¿Hay margen de mejora? / Antimicrobial management in community acquired pneumonia in hospital at home: Is there room for improvement?

Introducción: La neumonía adquirida en la comunidad (NAC) es una enfermedad frecuente que puede ser abordada en hospitalización a domicilio (HAD). En el presente trabajo evaluamos el margen de mejora con el uso de antibióticos en la NAC en HAD. Métodos: Se reclutaron retrospectivamente todos los pacientes con NAC en dos hospitales españoles desde el 01 de enero de 2018 al 30 de octubre de 2019. Se registraron variables demográficas, clínicas y sobre calidad de prescripción antibiótica. Posteriormente se construyó una variable que recogía seis indicadores de calidad asistencial, categorizando y comparando a los pacientes en dos grupos: buena calidad asistencial (cuatro o más indicadores realizados) o mala calidad asistencial (tres o menos indicadores realizados). Resultados: Obtuvimos una muestra de 260 pacientes. La solicitud de pruebas diagnósticas y la adecuación a las guías de práctica clínica fue del 85,4 y 85,8%, respectivamente. Los porcentajes de realización de desescalada (53,7%) y terapia secuencial (57,7%) cuando estaban indicadas fueron bajos. La duración media del tratamiento fue de 7,3 días para el intravenoso y 9,5 días para el total. La calidad de prescripción fue buena en 134 (63,2%) pacientes, siendo más frecuente en aquellos que ingresaron directamente en HAD desde urgencias. También se asoció a menor reingreso a 30 días. Conclusión: Existe un amplio margen de mejora en algunos aspectos con el uso de antimicrobianos en HAD, que podría motivar la implementación de programas de optimización del uso de antibióticos.(AU)

Introduction: Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is common disease that can be treated in Hospital At Home (HAH). In this paper we evaluate the room of improvement in the use of antibiotics in CAP in HH. Methods: Patients with CAP were retrospectively recruited in two Spanish hospitals from 1/1/18 to 10/30/19. Demographic, clinical and quality of antibiotic prescription variables were recorded. Subsequently, we created a new variable that collected six quality of care indicator, categorizing and comparing patients into two groups: good quality of care (4 or more indicators performed) or poor quality of care (3 or less indicators performed). Results: We recruited 260 patients. The request for diagnostic tests and the adequacy to Clinical Practice Guidelines were 85.4% and 85.8% respectively. Percentages of de-escalation (53.7%) and sequential therapy (57.7%) when indicated were low. The average length of treatment was 7.3 days for intravenous and 9.5 days for total. Quality of prescription was good in 134 (63.2%) patients, being more frequent in those who were admitted directly to HAD from the emergency room. It was also associated with less readmission at 30 days. Conclusion: There is a wide room for improvement in some fields of antimicrobials use in HAH that could stimulate the implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. (AU)

Cardiac Versus Renal Response to Volume Expansion in Preclinical Systolic Dysfunction With PDEV Inhibition and BNP.

Impaired cardiorenal response to acute saline volume expansion in preclinical systolic dysfunction (PSD) may lead to symptomatic heart failure. The objective was to determine if combination phosphodiesterase-V inhibition and exogenous B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) administration may enhance cardiorenal response. A randomized double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 21 subjects with PSD and renal dysfunction. Pre-treatment with tadalafil and subcutaneous BNP resulted in improved cardiac function, as evidenced by improvement in ejection fraction, left atrial volume index, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume. However, there was reduced renal response with reduction in renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, and urine flow. (Tadalafil and Nesiritide as Therapy in Pre-clinical Heart Failure; NCT01544998).

Amiloidosis cardiaca secundaria a la mutación familiar Glu54Gln del gen de la transtiretina / Cardiac involvement secondary to a familial form of transthyretin amyloidosis resulting from the Glu54Gln mutation

No disponible

Is there still a role for low-dose dopamine use in acute heart failure?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major health problem worldwide, with no proven therapy. Low-dose dopamine has been used in this entity to improve renal outcomes in the past decades. The aim of this article is to review the former and recent clinical trials about the use of low-dose dopamine in AHF. RECENT FINDINGS: The Dopamine in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure II study enrolled 161 patients with AHF and found no improvement in clinical outcomes with the addition of dopamine. Similarly, the Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure trial, which included 360 patients with AHF and renal dysfunction, evaluated the efficacy of 72-h infusion of either low-dose nesiritide or low-dose dopamine versus placebo in addition to standardized diuretic treatment. No differences were found between both treatment groups and placebo with regard to the coprimary endpoints of cumulative urine volume and change from baseline in plasma cystatin C. SUMMARY: On the basis of the current data, there is no role for the routine use of low-dose dopamine in nonhypotensive patients with AHF. Further studies are needed to define the role of low-dose dopamine in patients with AHF and hypotension. Until the availability of more data, the use of dopamine in AHF should be individualized.